![]() Under the Ottoman rule and until 1955, there were specialized Sharia Courts in charge of applying what these rules called. The Egyptian legal system is based on various sources that include, besides Islamic Sharia, civil law, specifically derived from the French legal system, Egyptian customs, natural law, and the principles of justice. Before 1971, Islamic Sharia was a de facto source of Egyptian law, especially in matters related to family law for Muslims. Although there was no constitutional requirement, there was a consensus that family law matters are regulated according to Islamic Sharia. The role of Islamic Sharia in the Egyptian legal system is complex. Islamic Sharia in the Egyptian Legal System In this post, I will explain the place of Islamic Sharia in the Egyptian legal system before analyzing the debate over its use as a criterion for constitutionality then I will present the chosen landmark judgment of the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt, which answers fundamental questions about Islamic Sharia. With its landmark judgment in 1985, the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt gave some fundamental answers to the most relevant questions about the relationship between the Sharia and the Egyptian Constitution. The meaning and application of Islamic Sharia in the Egyptian legal system is one of the most controversial aspects of modern constitutional law in Egypt. Virtual Roundtable: The Invisible Constitution.The Global South in Comparative Constitutional Law. ![]() The 'Third Option': Not Man, Not Woman, Not Nothing.Section 377 Judgment: Expanding LGBT Rights in India.Debate! The Citizens' Assembly in Ireland.Constitutional Landmark Judgments in the Commonwealth.Social Rights During and After COVID-19.Constitutional Landmark Judgments in Central and South America.100th Anniversary of the Austrian Constitutional Court.Constitutionalism and Pluralism in Overseas France.Constitutional Landmark Judgments in Asia.Constitutional Idolatry, Literacy, and Identity.Workshop my Paper: Moderated Parliamentarianism.Constitutional Landmark Judgments in the MENA Region.COVID-19 and the Future of Constitutionalism.The Centenary of the Constitution of Liechtenstein.200 Years Latin American States’ Independence and Indigenous Peoples.Workshop my Paper: ‘Good’ Court-Packing?.Constitutionalism in and from Central America.WMPS: The Gatekeepers: Executive Lawyers and Executive Power.V-Conversations | Book Discussions Book Interviews Constitutional Reflections on the Pandemic Conversations with Scholars Democracy 2020 - Global Roundtable.Bookshelf | Author Interviews Book Reviews COVID-19 E-Books Global Constitutionalism E-Book Series Journals New Titles & Discounts.Partners | COVID-DEM EURAC RESEARCH MPECCoL VRU Journal African Law Matters.Blog Symposia | About WMPS: The Gatekeepers: Executive Lawyers and Executive Power The Scramble for Lebanon Constitutionalism in and from Central America Constitutional Transformations Global Landmark Judgments Workshop my Paper: ‘Good’ Court-Packing? The Rights of Nature and Animals Women in the Judiciary 200 Years Latin American States’ Independence and Indigenous Peoples The Centenary of the Constitution of Liechtenstein COVID-19 and the Future of Constitutionalism Spotlight on Africa Constitutional Landmark Judgments in the MENA Region Workshop my Paper: Moderated Parliamentarianism Constitutional Amendments in Russia Centenary of the Turkish Constitution Gender and Constitutions Constitutional Idolatry, Literacy, and Identity Constitutional Landmark Judgments in Asia Constitutionalism and Pluralism in Overseas France 100th Anniversary of the Austrian Constitutional Court Constitutional Landmark Judgments in Central and South America Social Rights During and After COVID-19 Irish Unification Constitutional Landmark Judgments in the Commonwealth New Frontiers of Federalism 70 Years of the German Basic Law Indian Young Scholars 2019 Global Snapshot Membership and Exclusion Unwritten Constitutional Principles Crisis in Venezuela Towering Judges Debate! The Citizens' Assembly in Ireland The Constitutional Crisis in Sri Lanka Section 377 Judgment: Expanding LGBT Rights in India South Korea at a Crossroads Crisis at the Supreme Court of India? The 'Third Option': Not Man, Not Woman, Not Nothing The Global South in Comparative Constitutional Law Virtual Roundtable: The Invisible Constitution.The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court’s Interpretation of the Islamic Sharia as a Constitutional Check: Stalling the Radical Islamization of the Egyptian Legal System - IACL-IADC Blog IACL-IADC Blog
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |